DMCA.com Protection Status
Monetize your website traffic with yX Media
Huawei said it views the case against Mao, an associate professor at Xiamen University in China, as the US government's latest instance of 'selective prosecution'
Huawei said it views the case against Mao, an associate professor at Xiamen University in China, as the US government's latest instance of 'selective prosecution'
DAILYNEWS United States prosecutors have charged a Chinese professor with fraud for allegedly taking technology from a California company to benefit Huawei, in another shot at the embattled Chinese telecommunications equipment maker.
Bo Mao was arrested in Texas on August 14 and released six days later on $100,000 bond after he consented to proceed with the case in New York, according to court documents.
He pleaded not guilty in the US District Court in Brooklyn on August 28 to a charge of conspiring to commit wire fraud.
According to the criminal complaint, Mao entered into an agreement with the unnamed California tech company to obtain its circuit board, claiming it was for academic research.
But the complaint accuses an unidentified Chinese telecommunications conglomerate, which sources have told the Reuters news agency is Huawei, of trying to steal the technology, and alleges Mao played a role in its alleged scheme. A court document also indicates that the case is related to Huawei.
Mao, an associate professor at Xiamen University in China who also became a visiting professor at a Texas university last autumn, first gained attention as part of a Texas civil case between Huawei and Silicon Valley startup CNEX Labs Inc.
In December 2017, Huawei sued CNEX and a former employee, Yiren Huang, for stealing trade secrets. Huang, a former engineering manager at a US Huawei subsidiary, helped start CNEX in 2013, three days after leaving the company.
As part of its counterclaims, CNEX said Mao had asked for one of its circuit boards for a research project and that, after it sent the board to the professor, he used it for a study tied to Huawei.
That case ended in June with a "take nothing" verdict.
A jury did not find that CNEX stole trade secrets, but decided Huang violated his employment contract by not notifying the company of patents he obtained within a year of leaving.
However, the jury found that Huawei was not harmed and did not award any damages. The jury also found Huawei misappropriated a CNEX trade secret but awarded no damages on that claim, either.
Now, US prosecutors who have a case against Huawei in Brooklyn for alleged bank fraud and Iran sanctions violations, have revived the CNEX case.
Although the company has not been charged, Huawei said it views the case against Mao as the US government's latest instance of "selective prosecution".
"US federal prosecutors are charging forward with CNEX's allegations" despite the outcome of the civil case, a Huawei spokesman said in a statement, adding that US prosecutors had shown no interest in Huawei's claims against CNEX.
The spokesman noted that the US was charging Mao, even though the professor was never sued by CNEX and never called to testify at the civil trial.
A spokesman for the US Attorney's office in Brooklyn declined to comment, as did a lawyer for Mao, a CNEX spokesman, and a lawyer for Huang.
Huawei says the US government has made a concerted effort to discredit the company and curb its industry leadership. It said none of the accusations against it have been supported with sufficient evidence.
In January, US prosecutors announced an indictment against Huawei for trade secret theft involving T-Mobile, following a civil case between those companies.
The same day, the Justice Department unsealed the bank fraud indictment in Brooklyn that accused Huawei of misleading global banks about its business in Iran.
The US government has also lobbied other governments to ban Huawei equipment and banned companies from supplying Huawei with US components without special licenses, ratcheting up tensions between China and the US as they engage in a tit-for-tat trade war.
A Justice Department spokesman said last week that while the department does not comment on specific investigations, it complies with the law and all subjects "enjoy the same rights to due process afforded by our Constitution and safeguarded by an independent judiciary."
Related News
Previous Post Next Post